/TT1 12 Tf >> 2031.050, that allow the propounding party to ask for updated information bearing on answers already made and later acquired or discovered documents, tangible things, land or other property.. stream /Rotate 0 << (28)Tj Q /Filter /FlateDecode f BT 0 -24 TD /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s )]TJ T* q 0.71 -791.16 l stream {{currentYear}} American Bar Association, all rights reserved. 48 0 Td /TT1 12 Tf Plaintiff will treat this request as if it called for documents (1) that contain, include, or are derived from any statement made by a third party to the DOJ and (2) that were signed and/or adopted, formally or informally, by that third party. [( t)-1.1 (hi)-2 (s )-2 (R)-4.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-3 (. acquire the most less latency era to download any of our books afterward this one. -310.67 -24 Td x%90~NK(g@IH#D' Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as vague, ambiguous, overbroad, and unduly burdensome to the extent it asks Plaintiff to identify in detail "all facts known to these individuals and entities that are relevant to the DOJ's claims against Dentsply in this matter." 65 0 obj << 306.23 0 Td [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ 16 0 obj [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. dog off leash ticket california; Income Tax. (27)Tj f . The Definition is overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it attempts to extend the scope of this document request to documents in the possession, custody, or control of individuals, agencies, or entities other than the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, economists, and consultants either assigned to or reviewing this case. /Type /Page /Parent 15 0 R [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o obj)-2 (e)3.1 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (t)-2.2 (o t)-2 (he)3.1 ( phr)3 (a)4.9 (se)1.9 ( )-10.7 (\223)3.9 (c)-5.9 (hr)2.9 (oni)-1.9 (c)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-9.2 (i)-2.8 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)29.9 ( st)-3.7 (ud)-20.9 (y)20.8 (\224)4 ( )-10.8 (a)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( va)4.7 (g)10 (u)-9.9 (e)3.1 (, be)-5 (c)3 (a)4 (use)3 ( )]TJ T* 2. /Contents [92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R] )]TJ x+ | 67.32 0 Td DEFENDANT PAUL SAMPLE 'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OR THINGS SET ONE of requesting party, and the set number. T* >> 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm Plaintiff's Reply Also Objections To Defendant's Second Requirement ForDocuments And First Set The Interrogatories . 0 0 612 792 re T* /Type /Page Official websites use .gov 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re 5. /Annots [] Nor have such notes and/or memoranda of interviews been seen by anyone other than the case staff and other attorneys and staff of Plaintiff assisting with or reviewing the investigation. T* )-1839.167 (A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( )-150 (t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( )-149.1 (M)-1.1 (ons)-1.8 (a)4.8 (nt)-2 (o )-149.9 (ha)13.9 (s )-151.8 (not)-2 ( )-150.9 (c)3.9 (on)10 (duc)14 (ted )-148.9 (a)4.8 ( )-139.9 (c)3 (hr)3 (on)-9 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 ( )-150 (t)-1.9 (oxi)-2 (c)3.9 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29.1 ( )-119.9 (s)-10.1 (t)-2.9 (ud)-19.1 (y)19 ( )-129.9 (o)-10 (f)3.8 ( )-160.8 (a)3.9 (n)-19 (y)19 ( )-149 (of)2.9 ( )-150.8 (t)-1.1 (he)3 ( )]TJ << Defendant's document requests and interrogatory call for the production of documents and information that were produced to the Plaintiff by other entities and that may contain confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information. /Parent 15 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> Continue Reading Are You Following Up on Your Opponents Discovery Responses? [(C)-13 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (. << % [(f)3 (or)3 ( i)-1.9 (n t)-2.1 (hi)-2 (s t)-2.3 (i)-2 (t)-2.8 (l)-2 (e)4.7 (\224)4 ( w)1.1 (hich inc)3 (l)-1.9 (ude)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( r)3.8 (e)3.2 (qu)-10 (e)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s )-2 (f)2.7 (or)3 ( a)3.1 (dmi)-4 (s)-11.8 (si)-2.4 (on\))2.1 (;)-1.1 ( C)-3 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (. endobj BT /Filter /FlateDecode [(m)-1.1 (i)-2 (c)3 (e)4.1 ( 4029, 4032 a)4.8 (nd 404)-9.9 (1 of)2.1 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( hi)-2 (g)10.8 (h)-10.7 (-)2.9 (dose)2.8 (, a)4 (nd m)-12.8 (a)4 (l)-1.9 (e)4.7 ( 3023 of)3 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2 (d-)2.9 (dose)1.3 ( )-9.9 (g)9.9 (r)3 (oup)-9.1 (\224)3.9 ( a)3.2 (nd )]TJ [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.8 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.9 (. q EMC -349.92 -24 Td /CropBox [0 0 612 792] )-9 (\224)3 ( Monsanto )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf << BT 0.428 -431.088 l (11)Tj )9.9 ( )]TJ [(D)2 (i)-2 (vi)-1.1 (si)-4 (on c)3.9 (onc)3.1 (l)-1.9 (ude)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( t)-2 (he)4.8 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (na)3.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2 (ubul)-1.1 (e)3 ( )-9 (a)3.9 (de)3.2 (nom)-2 (a)4 (s)-10.1 ( f)2.9 (ound i)-1.9 (n t)-2.9 (he)4.8 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (d-)3.8 ( a)3.1 (nd hig)7.9 (h-)3 (dos)-11.8 (e)4 ( )-9.1 (g)9.1 (r)3.8 (oup )]TJ 1. /Font 135 0 R /Rotate 0 66 0 obj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm Plaintiff objects to Definition No. /Filter /FlateDecode f 1) litigators are not sending them. /Parent 15 0 R [(f)3 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (a)4.7 (l)-2.7 ( r)3.6 (e)-6.8 (g)9.9 (ulato)-10.9 (r)-16.9 (y)20.7 ( a)4 (c)3.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (on )-10.9 (w)2 (oul)-2 (d ha)3.9 (ve)4.9 ( se)1.2 (r)3 (i)-1.9 (ous )-2 (n)-11 (e)-5.1 (g)9.9 (a)4 (t)-12.8 (i)-1.1 (ve)3.1 ( e)4.8 (c)4 (onom)-1.9 (i)-2 (c)3.9 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (pe)3.1 (r)-6 (c)3.9 (uss)-2.8 (i)-2 (ons)-1.9 ( w)2.8 (hi)-2.8 (c)4.8 (h w)2 (e)3.1 ( be)4.9 (l)-2.8 (i)-2 (e)4.8 (v)-9.9 (e)3 ( )]TJ x%0>7P{oE%1D stream BT /Type /Page All such documents and information will not be produced. (7)Tj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] [(R)-2.1 (e)3 (que)4 (st)-3.6 (s)-1.1 ( a)3.9 (nd a)4.9 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( i)-2.8 (nc)4.8 (or)3 (po)-10.8 (r)3 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d b)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (f)2.2 (e)-5.1 (r)2.9 (e)3.2 (nc)-5.1 (e)3 ( th)-2 (e)2 (r)-6 (e)3 (in)-2 (. )]TJ /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 29.4 648.61 Td >> (10)Tj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm The court then separated the motions to compel from the motions to strike and refused to rule on the motion to strike stating There is no such motion.Is the court correct?. T* (7)Tj (21)Tj [(st)-2.2 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (Notwi)-1.2 (t)-2.9 (hst)-4.8 (a)4.7 (ndi)-1.9 (ng Mo)-2 (ns)-3.9 (a)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (ob)-1.8 (j)-2.9 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (on, Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3 (nto)-2 ( )]TJ (1)Tj C)-3 (ode)4 ( \247 )]TJ (28)Tj Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o a)4 (l)-2 (so)-2 ( )]TJ /Contents [108 0 R 109 0 R 110 0 R] >> 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] (21)Tj A)2.9 (l)-2.8 (l)-2 ( obj)-2 (e)3.9 (c)4.9 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (a)3.8 (nd gr)3 (ounds )-1.8 (a)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3 ( he)4 (r)-6 (e)3 (b)-19 (y)19 ( r)-6 (e)3 (se)3 (r)3.9 (ve)4 (d )-10.8 (a)4 (nd m)-2 (a)-16 (y)20.8 ( be)4 ( )]TJ T* T* Plaintiff objects to Instruction No. /Type /Page -73.07 -24 Td ET T* 27 0 obj /Type /Page T* (13)Tj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.7952 75.2636 Tm 1. << Near the end of discovery, it is wise to send out a more case-specific . 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm /GS0 gs -6 -24 Td 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm T* 302.16 0 Td -73.07 -24 Td (7)Tj (15)Tj [(D)1.1 (E)-2 (N)1.8 (IE)-4.8 (S)-4.8 ( )]TJ (1)Tj (22)Tj /brokenbar 168 /dieresis /copyright /ordfeminine 172 /logicalnot /.notdef /registered /macron endobj /AcroForm 6 0 R T* >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Annots [] << 2) my opposing counsel tends to argue that there is no obligation to prepare a privilege log unless it is demanded by the requesting party and I dont think thats right I think its an affirmative duty arising when someone withholds documents under an objection is that right?. Moreover, Plaintiff does not waive its right to amend its responses. 67.32 0 Td [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. /XObject 128 0 R << /TT0 12 Tf /Resources 79 0 R ET Plaintiffs object that the Request seeks documents that are work product, attorney-client communications, and/or documents that are protected under Rule 26(b)(4), including draft reports and communications between Plaintiffs' attorneys and the expert witness. )Tj /TT0 12 Tf /Annots [] 53 0 obj Q [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (s )-1.6 (t)-2.8 (o c)3.6 (om)-1.7 (pe)4.6 (t)-2.7 (e)-6.1 (nc)3.9 (e)4.9 (, r)3 (e)3.1 (l)-11.9 (e)4.8 (va)3.2 (nc)-5.1 (e)3.9 (, m)-1.9 (a)3 (ter)4.9 (i)-11.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (t)-2.9 (y)20.8 (,)-10.7 ( pr)2.8 (op)-9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3 (t)-21 (y)19.9 (, a)3.1 (nd a)4.9 (dm)-2.8 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-12 (bi)-2 (l)-1.1 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29 (, )-9.9 (a)4.8 (nd a)4 (n)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( a)3.1 (nd )-9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( )]TJ )9.1 ( )]TJ stream Plaintiff further objects to this instruction as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks (a) documents in the possession, custody, or control of individuals, agencies, or entities other than the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, economists, and consultants either assigned to or reviewing this case, (b) documents and answers to interrogatories previously produced by Defendant to Plaintiff in the course of Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, all transcripts of depositions of employees and former employees of Defendant, all correspondence between the Plaintiff and Defendant, all other information provided by Defendant to Plaintiff, and all information produced by Plaintiff to Defendant in response to discovery requests of Defendant, and (c) documents in possession, custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present officers, employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, and consultants to which the attorney work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, attorney-client privilege, or any other lawful privilege is applicable. << >> [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s R)-3.3 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-3.9 (. (19)Tj Secure .gov websites use HTTPS The party, person, or attorney did not respond in good faith to a request for production of documents made pursuant to Section 2020.010, 2020.410, 2020.510, or 2025.210, or to an inspection demand made pursuant to Section 2031.010. T* Plaintiff objects to Instruction No. Q [(se)2.9 (r)3 (ve)4.8 (d b)-20.8 (y)20.8 ( m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (i)-1.9 (l)-2 ( a)3.9 (nd )-10.8 (\223)4.8 (e)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (he)-6.8 (r)2.8 ( t)-1.8 (he)4.7 ( pl)-2.7 (a)4.7 (c)3.2 (e)4 ( o)-9.1 (f)2.9 ( m)-1.9 (a)3 (il)-4 (i)-2 (ng)9 ( o)-9 (r)2.9 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( pl)-1.9 (a)3 (c)4 (e)4.9 ( o)-10.8 (f)3 ( a)4.8 (ddr)-7.8 (e)4 (ss)-3 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (ou)-2 (t)-2.1 (si)-4 (de)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.1 ( S)-3.1 (t)-2 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.1 ( of)3 ( )]TJ 3. ET 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.995 679.0819 Tm -394.07 -24 Td OBJECTIONS TO INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] (7. 286.67 0 Td << 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 102.9337315 216.752748 cm 44.75 0 Td T* (28)Tj /florin /fraction /guilsinglleft /guilsinglright /minus /perthousand /quotedblbase /quotedblleft /quotedblright /quoteleft 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re 50 0 obj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 314.5065 86.2909 Tm q /Length 144 0 R /TT0 8.03 Tf -103.32 -24 Td 4 0 obj (3)Tj f Plaintiff further objects to this request as duplicative, overbroad, and burdensome even if the term "reflected" were construed more narrowly to include only documents containing or including verbatim statements. /Length 137 0 R )]TJ /Contents [116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R] /TT0 8.03 Tf T* T* /Rotate 0 Plaintiff further objects to this request, whether broadly or more narrowly construed, to the extent it seeks production of documents protected by the work product doctrine, the governmental deliberative process privilege, or the attorney-client privilege. /GS0 gs endobj T* Q -72 -24 Td This request, in essence, then, asks for the recollections of the attorneys representing the United States, or of the staff working under their direction, or for information contained in memoranda and notes prepared by those attorneys and their staff. /Resources 87 0 R ( )Tj 46 0 obj /Length 132 0 R -72 -24 Td Objectives are steps towards goals. [(c)4 (ont)-2 (a)4 (i)-1.9 (n a)4.5 ( pr)3 (e)-6.7 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (se)1.9 ( de)-6.7 (f)3.7 (i)-1.9 (ni)-2.9 (t)-2 (i)-2 (on of)3 ( t)-2 (he)4 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( a)3.1 (nd r)-6.1 (e)3.9 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)3 (e)-5.9 (nc)3.9 (e)3.2 (s )-2 (a)3 ( va)-5.9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.9 (t)-21.1 (y)19.1 ( of)3.8 ( t)-2.7 (ox)-9.2 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)19 ( )]TJ T* /Outlines 4 0 R Plaintiff can only know those facts, of which it is aware, that are known to such individuals and entities. 21 0 obj (m)Tj T* f [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( a)3.1 (f)2.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (r)3.9 ( r)13 (e)4 (c)3.2 (e)4.8 (i)7.1 (pt )-2 (o)8.9 (f)3 ( EP)-2.7 (A)1.9 (\222)2.2 (s )8.8 (J)-10.9 (ul)-12.8 (y)19.8 ( )30.9 (29, 1985 l)-2.8 (e)4.8 (t)-11.9 (t)-2 (e)3 (r)3 (, Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)4 (nt)-2 (o st)-4 (a)4 (t)-2 (e)14 (d t)8.8 (ha)3.1 (t)8.9 ( EP)-2.7 (A)2.7 (\222)13 (s )]TJ 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re If you need to request documents in an employment discrimination case or if you need to respond to a request for documents from the other side, you can get templates from the Legal Help Centers. In fact, boilerplate general objections are sanctionable in California per Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513 and may result in waivers of privilege per Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry Co. v. U.S. Dist. [(D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (IE)-5.8 (S)]TJ (22)Tj /Filter /FlateDecode regarding requests for production of documents. 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the interrogatory to those individuals and entities interviewed by Plaintiff pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009. 6. /TT1 12 Tf )-8 (M)-1.9 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-1.9 (o ot)-2.9 (he)4.8 (r)3 (w)1.1 (is)-3 (e)3 ( )]TJ /TT1 12 Tf Continue Reading DISCOVERY GAMES AND MISCONCEPTIONS Is the Court Correct That There is No Motion to Strike in Discovery? /Parent 15 0 R << 47.75 0 Td (14)Tj Software. T* 65.4 648.61 Td ( )Tj f 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.6004 679.0819 Tm %PDF-1.7 2. DISCOVERY GAMES AND MISCONCEPTIONSWhat is Wrong with this Document Response? /TT0 12 Tf All of the depositions taken of individuals listed in Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures, all documents produced by the individuals and entities listed in these Disclosures, and all of the correspondence from such individuals and entities listed in such Disclosures have already been, or are being, produced to the Defendant. (12)Tj 26 April 2023 . [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ ET ET 44.76 0 Td pD1visp[n5pL3lQtM;-a-VO}]ny]t;pcgj(q =vwVB~dm$ 4H^~#Ead4*KSj:sLGLvBSHr$$UKe;vtT='l6tdfIKq5'H=l#?JzT=A?qjf)$d?RTia&p%NoD]FYD/}@J!>1Za{JZ:LigFmhHgSLI a^xrJgr,6l_. Plaintiff objects to this document request as overbroad, burdensome, vague, and ambiguous to the extent that it relies on the term "reflecting," which is not defined in Dentsply's Second Request for Documents and First Set of Interrogatories. )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ -48.829 -12 Td (2)Tj /Rotate 0 (4)Tj /Rotate 0 [(oc)4 (c)4.8 (ur)3 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (d on or)3 ( a)3.2 (b)-9.1 (out)-2.9 ( S)-4 (e)3.9 (pt)-1.9 (e)4.8 (m)-2.7 (be)4.7 (r)3 ( 4, 1985. 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.0332519 -39.599996 cm /TT1 12 Tf /Contents [100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Q T* f endstream [(c)4 (hr)3.8 (oni)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)3 (it)-14 (y)29.1 ( st)-3.1 (udi)-2 (e)3 (s o)-10.9 (n g)10.8 (l)-22.7 (y)20.7 (phosa)1.3 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 ( )-10 (\()3.8 (a)3.2 (l)-1.1 (l)-2 ( 12-)2.9 (m)-1.9 (on)-10.9 (t)-1.1 (hs )-2 (or long)10.9 (e)-6.8 (r)3 (\))3.8 ( use)2.1 (d i)-1.9 (n t)-2 (he)3.9 ( )-10.8 (l)-2 (a)4 (t)-2 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( r)2.1 (e)4 (s)-10 (e)3.9 (a)3.2 (r)-6.1 (c)3.1 (h a)4 (nd )]TJ 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re 47.76 0 Td /Type /Page The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. 3. [(A)2 (m)-2 (e)4 (n)9.9 (de)4 (d)10 ( )-199 (a)3.1 (nd )10.8 (S)5.2 (upp)10.8 (l)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (nt)-2.7 (a)13.9 (l)-2 ( R)-3 (e)13.9 (que)14 (st)7 (s )-1.8 (f)2 (or)2.1 ( )10.9 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)6 (i)-1.9 (ons \()1.8 (J)-11 (une)4.8 ( 29, )9.1 (2017\))13 (])-6 (. /Usage 16 0 R Plaintiff objects to each document request to the extent that it calls for production of a privilege log for internal documents of Plaintiff. Such materials contain the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government's attorneys in summarizing the Government's understanding of information obtained in the interview, for instance by the emphasis in memoranda of the specific issues of interest to the Division's legal analysis. Responding party objects to this request to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. 29 0 obj /XObject 134 0 R -138.71 -24 Td Subject to and notwithstanding this objection, in responding to these discovery requests, Plaintiff will treat the term "third party," as extending to all individuals and entities, not named as parties to this lawsuit, listed on Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures. << 3 on the grounds that it is vague and ambiguous, that it calls for the production of documents that are irrelevant to this action and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome, to the extent that it calls for the production of documents in the format as they may be maintained in files outside of the principal investigatory and case files. T* h 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm /Fm0 Do (11)Tj -103.32 -24 Td -154.07 -24 Td Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, and pursuant to Rules 33 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court, responds and objects to Defendant Dentsply International, Inc.'s ("Dentsply") Second Request for Documents and First Set of Interrogatories as follows: 1. 35 0 obj /Fm0 Do endobj /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] 36 -24 Td T* /TT1 12 Tf Plaintiff will produce responsive documents only to the extent that such documents are in the possession, custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.Plaintiff's possession, custody, or control does not include any constructive possession that may be conferred by Plaintiff's right or power to compel the production of documents or information from third parties or to request their production from other divisions of the Department of Justice or agencies of the United States. /Type /Pages 51.12 0 Td Home; Service. CCP, which can be used in other jurisdictions as well. -139.67 -24 Td Among other things, the defendant objected to the extent that [the request] is overly broad and unduly burdensome. The court ruled that those objections did not comply with Rule 34: The court ordered the defendant to conform its responses and objections to the requirements of Rule 34. power bi create measure based on column value, random demon slayer character wheel,
© 2023 Lembecker TV 1974 e.V.